↓ Skip to main content

Road traffic related mortality in Vietnam: Evidence for policy from a national sample mortality surveillance system

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Road traffic related mortality in Vietnam: Evidence for policy from a national sample mortality surveillance system
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-561
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anh D Ngo, Chalapati Rao, Nguyen Phuong Hoa, Damian G Hoy, Khieu Thi Quynh Trang, Peter S Hill

Abstract

Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are among the leading causes of mortality in Vietnam. However, mortality data collection systems in Vietnam in general and for RTIs in particular, remain inconsistent and incomplete. Underlying distributions of external causes and body injuries are not available from routine data collection systems or from studies till date. This paper presents characteristics, user type pattern, seasonal distribution, and causes of 1,061 deaths attributable to road crashes ascertained from a national sample mortality surveillance system in Vietnam over a two-year period (2008 and 2009).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 118 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Other 9 8%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 22%
Engineering 16 13%
Social Sciences 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 34 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,659,250
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,535
of 15,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,735
of 165,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#89
of 335 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 335 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.