↓ Skip to main content

Temozolomide or bevacizumab for spinal cord high-grade gliomas

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Temozolomide or bevacizumab for spinal cord high-grade gliomas
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11060-012-0905-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas J. Kaley, Ijah Mondesire-Crump, Igor T. Gavrilovic

Abstract

High-grade gliomas of the spinal cord are rare tumors, traditionally managed with surgery and radiotherapy. Once patients fail standard treatment, many receive some chemotherapy, although the data supporting such is limited. We reviewed our experience treating high-grade gliomas of the spinal cord with standard intracranial regimens including temozolomide and bevacizumab. Outcomes investigated include radiographic response, clinical response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. We identified eight patients who were treated with temozolomide and six who were treated with bevacizumab. Temozolomide was administered to three patients at initial diagnosis and five patients at recurrence after failing prior radiotherapy. For the recurrent patients, the median time-to-progression was 6.6 months (range 1-40 months) and the median overall survival from initiation of temozolomide was 16.6 months (range 1.2-64.5 months). We identified six patients who received bevacizumab at the time of recurrence. MRI demonstrated a partial response in five patients which also correlated with clinical improvement. The median time to progression was 20.7 months (range 3.3-29.9 months) and median overall survival was 22.8 months (range 3.3-31.8 months). This retrospective review suggests that temozolomide and bevacizumab may be beneficial in spinal cord high-grade gliomas. The compact architecture of the spinal cord makes bevacizumab a particularly appealing agent due to the drug's effect on peritumoral edema and mass effect.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 9 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 44%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2012.
All research outputs
#15,247,248
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,938
of 2,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,311
of 166,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,955 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.