↓ Skip to main content

Optimising recruitment and informed consent in randomised controlled trials: the development and implementation of the Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI)

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
55 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Optimising recruitment and informed consent in randomised controlled trials: the development and implementation of the Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI)
Published in
Trials, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1391-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenny L. Donovan, Leila Rooshenas, Marcus Jepson, Daisy Elliott, Julia Wade, Kerry Avery, Nicola Mills, Caroline Wilson, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Jane M. Blazeby

Abstract

Pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are considered essential to determine effective interventions for routine clinical practice, but many fail to recruit participants efficiently, and some really important RCTs are not undertaken because recruitment is thought to be too difficult. The 'QuinteT Recruitment Intervention' (QRI) aims to facilitate informed decision making by patients about RCT participation and to increase recruitment. This paper presents the development and implementation of the QRI. The QRI developed iteratively as a complex intervention. It emerged from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) ProtecT trial and has been developed further in 13 RCTs. The final version of the QRI uses a combination of standard and innovative qualitative research methods with some simple quantification to understand recruitment and identify sources of difficulties. The QRI has two major phases: understanding recruitment as it happens and then developing a plan of action to address identified difficulties and optimise informed consent in collaboration with the RCT chief investigator (CI) and the Clinical Trials Unit (CTU). The plan of action usually includes RCT-specific, as well as generic, aspects. The QRI can be used in two ways: it can be integrated into the feasibility/pilot or main phase of an RCT to prevent difficulties developing and optimise recruitment from the start, or it can be applied to an ongoing RCT experiencing recruitment shortfalls, with a view to rapidly improving recruitment and informed consent or gathering evidence to justify RCT closure. The QRI provides a flexible way of understanding recruitment difficulties and producing a plan to address them while ensuring engaged and well-informed decision making by patients. It can facilitate recruitment to the most controversial and important RCTs. QRIs are likely to be of interest to the CIs and CTUs developing proposals for 'difficult' RCTs or for RCTs with lower than expected recruitment and to the funding bodies wishing to promote efficient recruitment in pragmatic RCTs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 142 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Master 18 12%
Other 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Psychology 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 42 29%