↓ Skip to main content

A review on human attitudes towards reptiles in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
Title
A review on human attitudes towards reptiles in Brazil
Published in
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10661-011-2465-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves, Kleber Silva Vieira, Gindomar Gomes Santana, Washington Luiz Silva Vieira, Waltécio Oliveira Almeida, Wedson Medeiros Silva Souto, Paulo Fernando Guedes Pereira Montenegro, Juarez Carlos Brito Pezzuti

Abstract

For many millennia humans and reptiles have interacted, but the attitude of humans towards these animals has depended on culture, environment, and personal experience. At least 719 reptile species are known to occur in Brazil and about 11% of this fauna has been exploited for many different purposes, including bushmeat, leather, ornamental and magic/religious uses, and as folk medicines. Brazil can therefore serve as an interesting case study for better understanding reptile use by human societies, and the present paper catalogues some of the reptile species being used in Brazil and discusses implications for their conservation. A literature review indicated that 81 reptile species are culturally important in this country, with 47 (58%) species having multiple uses, 54 being used for medicinal purposes, 38 as food, 28 for ornamental or decorative purposes, 20 used in magic/religious practices, 18 as pets, and 40 are commonly killed when they come into contact with humans. Regarding their conservation status, 30 (37.5%) are included on State's Red List, Brazilian Red List or the IUCN Red List. There are many forms of interaction between reptiles and humans in Brazil-although most of them are quite negative in terms of wildlife conservation-which reinforces the importance of understanding such uses and interactions in the context of protecting reptiles in Brazil. A better understanding of the cultural, social, and traditional roles of these reptiles is fundamental to establishing management plans for their sustainable use.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 15 6%
Mexico 2 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 237 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 53 21%
Student > Master 45 17%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 10%
Professor 15 6%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 45 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 105 41%
Environmental Science 55 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 56 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,661,250
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#534
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,979
of 245,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.