You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deception in Research Is Morally Problematic … and so too Is Not Using It Morally: Reply to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Use of Deception in Public Health Behavioral Intervention Trials: A Case Study of Three Online Alcohol Trials”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The American Journal of Bioethics, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1080/15265161.2014.862418 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jim McCambridge, Kypros Kypri, Preben Bendtsen, John Porter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 27% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Librarian | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 20% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 30% |
| Psychology | 4 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The American Journal of Bioethics
#1,806
of 2,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,060
of 321,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Journal of Bioethics
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.