↓ Skip to main content

Dabrafenib in an elderly patient with metastatic melanoma and BRAF V600R mutation: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Dabrafenib in an elderly patient with metastatic melanoma and BRAF V600R mutation: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13256-016-0953-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Casadevall, Joana Vidal, Fernando Gallardo, Flavio Zuccarino, Montserrat Arumí-Uría, Alba Dalmases, Beatriz Bellosillo, Clara Montagut

Abstract

Approximately 50 % of malignant melanomas harbor activating point mutations in the BRAF gene. Typically, these mutations result in the substitution of the amino acid valine at codon 600 of the gene, and 90-95 % of mutations are either BRAF (V600E) or BRAF (V600K). Specific BRAF inhibitors such as dabrafenib and vemurafenib are the mainstays of treatment in patients with metastatic BRAF-mutant malignant melanomas. The third most common BRAF mutation is V600R, which also leads to increased BRAF signaling. Although evidence exists about the activity of dabrafenib and vemurafenib in patients with the BRAF (V600R) mutation, these patients have been systematically excluded from recent trials with targeted therapies. Here, we report the positive results in terms of survival and quality of life obtained with dabrafenib in an 80-year-old Caucasian male patient with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 8 diagnosed with metastatic malignant melanoma harboring the BRAF (V600R) mutation. Our patient was treated with dabrafenib for 7 months with minimal toxicity. We also report exploratory analyses of circulating tumor DNA during targeted treatment. Interestingly, the mutation was not detected after starting treatment and became detectable before radiological disease progression. Our report suggests that (1) a relevant benefit can be obtained with a BRAF inhibitor in real-world patients with a malignant melanoma harboring a BRAF (V600R) mutation, and that (2) circulating tumor DNA detection might be of help in assessing tumor burden in everyday clinical practice. The results reported here should encourage the inclusion of patients with BRAF (V600R)-mutated malignant melanomas in future prospective clinical trials with BRAF inhibitors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Other 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,462,696
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#2,264
of 3,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,893
of 339,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#23
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,928 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.