| Title |
Long-Term Outcomes of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in the SCD-HeFT
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.061 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeanne E. Poole, Brian Olshansky, Daniel B. Mark, Jill Anderson, George Johnson, Anne S. Hellkamp, Linda Davidson-Ray, Daniel P. Fishbein, Robin E. Boineau, Kevin J. Anstrom, Per G. Reinhall, Douglas L. Packer, Kerry L. Lee, Gust H. Bardy, SCD-HeFT Investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 16% |
| Spain | 7 | 7% |
| Colombia | 7 | 7% |
| Argentina | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 19% |
| Scientists | 11 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 33 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#599,534
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,537
of 16,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,552
of 432,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#49
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.