↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-based prevention of Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of 243 observational prospective studies and 153 randomised controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 7,437)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
136 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
987 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
280 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
699 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence-based prevention of Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of 243 observational prospective studies and 153 randomised controlled trials
Published in
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, July 2020
DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321913
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin-Tai Yu, Wei Xu, Chen-Chen Tan, Sandrine Andrieu, John Suckling, Evangelos Evangelou, An Pan, Can Zhang, Jianping Jia, Lei Feng, Ee-Heok Kua, Yan-Jiang Wang, Hui-Fu Wang, Meng-Shan Tan, Jie-Qiong Li, Xiao-He Hou, Yu Wan, Lin Tan, Vincent Mok, Lan Tan, Qiang Dong, Jacques Touchon, Serge Gauthier, Paul S Aisen, Bruno Vellas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 987 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 699 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 699 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 77 11%
Student > Master 75 11%
Student > Bachelor 61 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 8%
Other 45 6%
Other 148 21%
Unknown 239 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 155 22%
Neuroscience 73 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 7%
Psychology 43 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 3%
Other 78 11%
Unknown 277 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1704. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,343
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#3
of 7,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#348
of 431,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#1
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.