| Title |
Comparison of Atrial Remodeling Caused by Sustained Atrial Flutter Versus Atrial Fibrillation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.062 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Baptiste Guichard, Patrice Naud, Feng Xiong, Xiaoyan Qi, Nathalie L’Heureux, Roddy Hiram, Jean-Claude Tardif, Raymond Cartier, Antoine Da Costa, Stanley Nattel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 12% |
| United States | 9 | 11% |
| France | 4 | 5% |
| Mexico | 4 | 5% |
| Argentina | 4 | 5% |
| Germany | 4 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Japan | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 14% |
| Scientists | 10 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2020.
All research outputs
#829,682
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,099
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,063
of 432,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#63
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.