↓ Skip to main content

The chemistry of gut microbial metabolism of polyphenols

Overview of attention for article published in Phytochemistry Reviews, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
Title
The chemistry of gut microbial metabolism of polyphenols
Published in
Phytochemistry Reviews, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11101-016-9459-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan F. Stevens, Claudia S. Maier

Abstract

Gut microbiota contribute to the metabolism of dietary polyphenols and affect the bioavailability of both the parent polyphenols and their metabolites. Although there is a large number of reports of specific polyphenol metabolites, relatively little is known regarding the chemistry and enzymology of the metabolic pathways utilized by specific microbial species and taxa, which is the focus of this review. Major classes of dietary polyphenols include monomeric and oligomeric catechins (proanthocyanidins), flavonols, flavanones, ellagitannins, and isoflavones. Gut microbial metabolism of representatives of these polyphenol classes can be classified as A- and C-ring cleavage (retro Claisen reactions), C-ring cleavage mediated by dioxygenases, dehydroxylations (decarboxylation or reduction reactions followed by release of H2O molecules), and hydrogenations of alkene moieties in polyphenols, such as resveratrol, curcumin, and isoflavones (mediated by NADPH-dependent reductases). The qualitative and quantitative metabolic output of the gut microbiota depends to a large extent on the metabolic capacity of individual taxa, which emphasizes the need for assessment of functional analysis in conjunction with determinations of gut microbiota compositions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 242 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 21%
Student > Master 38 16%
Researcher 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 51 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 13%
Chemistry 18 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 5%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 73 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,558,139
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#102
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,744
of 299,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them