↓ Skip to main content

Posterior fossa ependymoma: current insights

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Posterior fossa ependymoma: current insights
Published in
Child's Nervous System, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00381-015-2823-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuan Y. Thompson, Vijay Ramaswamy, Phedias Diamandis, Craig Daniels, Michael D. Taylor

Abstract

Ependymoma is the third most common malignant tumor of the posterior fossa and is a major cause of neurological morbidity and mortality in children. Current treatments, particularly surgery and external beam irradiation result in relatively poor outcomes with significant neurological and cognitive sequelae from treatment. Historical approaches have considered all ependymomas as similar entities based on their morphological appearance. Recent advances in genomics and epigenetics have revealed, however, that ependymomas from different CNS locations represent distinct entities. Moreover, ependymoma of the posterior fossa, the most common location in children, is actually comprised of two distinct molecular variants. These two variants have marked differences in demographics, transcriptomes, structure, methylation patterns, and clinical outcomes. This allows for the development of new biology-based clinical risk stratification, which can both prioritize patients for de-escalation of therapy and identify those who will benefit from novel therapeutic strategies. Indeed, the identification of these two variants allows an opportunity for robust preclinical modeling for development of novel therapeutic strategies. Herein, we have summarized our current clinical approach to diagnosis and treatment of posterior fossa ependymoma, recent advances in understanding the biology of posterior fossa ependymoma and how these new insights can be translated into the clinic to form the basis of the next generation of clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 20 26%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Psychology 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,332,117
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#1,794
of 2,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,585
of 267,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#27
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,763 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.