↓ Skip to main content

Do Two Wrongs Make a Right? Persistent Uncertainties Regarding Environmental Selenium–Mercury Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do Two Wrongs Make a Right? Persistent Uncertainties Regarding Environmental Selenium–Mercury Interactions
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, July 2020
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.0c01894
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline R. Gerson, David M. Walters, Collin A. Eagles-Smith, Emily S. Bernhardt, Jessica E. Brandt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 8 12%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Chemistry 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 28 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,282,604
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#5,088
of 20,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,127
of 430,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#83
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.