↓ Skip to main content

Sarcopenia/Muscle Mass is not a Prognostic Factor for Short‐ and Long‐Term Outcome After Esophagectomy for Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Sarcopenia/Muscle Mass is not a Prognostic Factor for Short‐ and Long‐Term Outcome After Esophagectomy for Cancer
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00268-016-3603-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brechtje A. Grotenhuis, Joël Shapiro, Stefan van Adrichem, Marianne de Vries, Marcel Koek, Bas P. L. Wijnhoven, J. Jan B. van Lanschot

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 36 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Psychology 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 43 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,459
of 4,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,993
of 357,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#51
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.