↓ Skip to main content

ISPD Peritonitis Recommendations: 2016 Update on Prevention and Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
169 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
797 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
872 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ISPD Peritonitis Recommendations: 2016 Update on Prevention and Treatment
Published in
Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis, September 2016
DOI 10.3747/pdi.2016.00078
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip Kam-Tao Li, Cheuk Chun Szeto, Beth Piraino, Javier de Arteaga, Stanley Fan, Ana E. Figueiredo, Douglas N. Fish, Eric Goffin, Yong-Lim Kim, William Salzer, Dirk G. Struijk, Isaac Teitelbaum, David W. Johnson

Abstract

Peritonitis is a common and serious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Although less than 5% of peritonitis episodes result in death, peritonitis is the direct or major contributing cause of death in around 16% of PD patients (1-6). In addition, severe or prolonged peritonitis leads to structural and functional alterations of the peritoneal membrane, eventually leading to membrane failure. Peritonitis is a major cause of PD technique failure and conversion to long-term hemodialysis (1,5,7,8). Recommendations under the auspices of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) were first published in 1983 and revised in 1993, 1996, 2000, 2005, and 2010 (9-14). The present recommendations are organized into 5 sections: 1. Peritonitis rate 2. Prevention of peritonitis 3. Initial presentation and management of peritonitis 4. Subsequent management of peritonitis 5.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 169 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 872 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 870 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 113 13%
Student > Bachelor 95 11%
Student > Postgraduate 91 10%
Researcher 83 10%
Student > Master 71 8%
Other 183 21%
Unknown 236 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 423 49%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 74 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 64 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 1%
Other 41 5%
Unknown 248 28%