| Title |
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in primary and community care during the COVID-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x711797 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kamlesh Khunti, Sebastian Straube, Anil Adisesh, Xin Hui S Chan, Amitava Banerjee, Trisha Greenhalgh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 30% |
| Ireland | 3 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 21% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,211,728
of 24,041,016 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,072
of 4,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,286
of 402,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#25
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,041,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.