↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of manual therapy compared to usual care by the general practitioner for chronic tension-type headache: design of a randomised clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
359 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of manual therapy compared to usual care by the general practitioner for chronic tension-type headache: design of a randomised clinical trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-10-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

René F Castien, Daniëlle AWM van der Windt, Joost Dekker, Bert Mutsaers, Anneke Grooten

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 354 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 19%
Student > Bachelor 50 14%
Researcher 36 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 8%
Student > Postgraduate 24 7%
Other 71 20%
Unknown 79 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Sports and Recreations 14 4%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 92 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2013.
All research outputs
#13,132,715
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,814
of 4,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,371
of 171,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.