Title |
Rapid and mobile determination of alcoholic strength in wine, beer and spirits using a flow-through infrared sensor
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Chemistry, March 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1752-153x-4-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dirk W Lachenmeier, Rolf Godelmann, Markus Steiner, Bob Ansay, Jürgen Weigel, Gunther Krieg |
Abstract |
Ever since Gay-Lussac's time, the alcoholic strength by volume (% vol) has been determined by using densimetric measurements. The typical reference procedure involves distillation followed by pycnometry, which is comparably labour-intensive and therefore expensive. At present, infrared (IR) spectroscopy in combination with multivariate regression is widely applied as a screening procedure, which allows one to determine alcoholic strength in less than 2 min without any sample preparation. The disadvantage is the relatively large investment for Fourier transform (FT) IR or near-IR instruments, and the need for matrix-dependent calibration. In this study, we apply a much simpler device consisting of a patented multiple-beam infrared sensor in combination with a flow-through cell for automated alcohol analysis, which is available in a portable version that allows for on-site measurements. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 2 | 33% |
Germany | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 109 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 18% |
Researcher | 14 | 12% |
Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 17% |
Unknown | 21 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 28 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 16% |
Engineering | 14 | 12% |
Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 4% |
Materials Science | 4 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Unknown | 31 | 27% |