↓ Skip to main content

Biomarkers Guided Treatment Strategies in Adult Patients with Asthma: Ready for the Clinical Field?

Overview of attention for article published in Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Biomarkers Guided Treatment Strategies in Adult Patients with Asthma: Ready for the Clinical Field?
Published in
Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00005-016-0407-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zoi Tsilogianni, Polyxeni Ntontsi, Andriana I. Papaioannou, Petros Bakakos, Stelios Loukides

Abstract

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airways disorder mainly characterized by heterogeneity. In the more severe forms, a discordance often exists between symptoms and inflammation. Difficulty in managing asthma derives partly from the multiple phenotypes existing and our inability to recognize them. The use of non-invasive, with main representative the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide, or semi-invasive techniques such as induced sputum are effective tools that can help us to guide asthma treatment. In the latest years, several serum biomarkers related to asthmatic inflammation have been used for the better recognition of asthma sub-phenotypes to achieve optimization of therapy and disease outcome. In patients with mild-moderate asthma, as well as patients with more severe asthma, the use of blood eosinophils revealed an acceptable accuracy for the prediction of airway eosinophilia indicating that in future studies may facilitate both individualized treatment and management of asthma. None of the above techniques have been incorporated in clinical practice although sputum eosinophils can be used in patients with severe asthma particularly in specialized centers with great experience. Of great interest are blood eosinophils since current data support their role either as tool for treatment selections or/and as a biomarker of airway eosinophilia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Computer Science 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#19,073,347
of 24,288,533 outputs
Outputs from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#279
of 395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,548
of 346,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,288,533 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 395 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.