↓ Skip to main content

Sensation machine: Film, phenomenology and the training of the senses

Overview of attention for article published in Continuum, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sensation machine: Film, phenomenology and the training of the senses
Published in
Continuum, July 2012
DOI 10.1080/10304312.2012.698033
Authors

Elizabeth Stephens

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 30%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 11 37%
Social Sciences 4 13%
Philosophy 3 10%
Design 3 10%
Computer Science 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2012.
All research outputs
#18,310,549
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Continuum
#464
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,115
of 164,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Continuum
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.