↓ Skip to main content

Iodine in commercial edible iodized salts and assessment of iodine exposure in Sri Lanka

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Public Health, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Iodine in commercial edible iodized salts and assessment of iodine exposure in Sri Lanka
Published in
Archives of Public Health, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13690-016-0133-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meththika Vithanage, Indika Herath, S. S. Achinthya, Tharanga Bandara, Lakshika Weerasundara, S. S. Mayakaduwa, Yohan Jayawardhana, Prasanna Kumarathilaka

Abstract

Iodine is an essential micronutrient used by the thyroid gland in the production of thyroid hormones. Both excessive and insufficient iodine intakes can cause thyroid diseases thus harmful to the human body. Inadequate iodine intake by human body causes Iodine Deficiency Disorders (IDD) and hypothyroidism. Excessive iodine intake causes Iodine Induced Hyperthyroidism (IIH). Universal Salt Iodization (USI) is the most effective way of preventing IDD. This study determined the concentrations of iodine species in commercial edible salt products, the stability of iodine at different conditions and iodine exposure at the consumer level. The iodine contents of six commercial edible iodized salts were determined qualitatively and quantitatively for both iodide and iodate. Thereafter, the first three products of highest iodine contents, the stability of iodide at exposed to air and heat was measured after 24 hours. Risk assessment of exposure was done at four levels considering the WHO estimation. Results revealed that all of the salt products have excess iodine that is above the fortification level of 15-30 mg kg(-1) level in Sri Lanka. Iodide stability was reduced at the average percentages of 13.1, 10.7 and 11.3. The iodate loss percentages were 0, 5.7 and 0 at open air. The iodide loss percentages at the temperature of 50 °C were 4.6, 7.8 and 8.6 while at 100 °C, loss percentages were 11.1, 11.4 and 15.9 for the same salt products. The iodine exposure at lower consumption during cooking ranged 244.4-432.2 μg/day while 325.9-576.3 μg/day for medium consumption, 407.4-720.4 μg/day for moderate high salt consumptions and 488.8-864.4 μg/day for high salt consumptions. As a total 95.8 % cases can cause IIH and only 4.1 % of them can provide optimal iodine nutrition in a population. Iodine exposure without cooking ranged 305.5-540.3 μg/day for low salt consumption, 407.4-720.4 μg/day for medium consumption and 509.2-900.5 μg/day for moderate high consumption and 611.1-1080.6 μg/day for high salt consumptions. All of the incidents (100 %) of consumption without cooking at the household level can cause excessive iodine intake and IIH in a population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 21 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 24 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Public Health
#774
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,904
of 352,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Public Health
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.