↓ Skip to main content

The effect of mental stress on heart rate variability and blood pressure during computer work

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
patent
15 patents
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
568 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
906 Mendeley
Title
The effect of mental stress on heart rate variability and blood pressure during computer work
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00421-004-1055-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nis Hjortskov, Dag Rissén, Anne Katrine Blangsted, Nils Fallentin, Ulf Lundberg, Karen Søgaard

Abstract

The aim was to evaluate the cardiovascular and subjective stress response to a combined physical and mental workload, and the effect of rest. Twelve females who had no prior experience of laboratory experiments participated in the study. Computer-work-related mental stressors were either added to or removed from a standardized computer work session in the laboratory. Beat-to-beat blood pressure and electrocardiogram (ECG) were recorded continuously during the experiment. The participants reported subjective experiences of stress in six categories using an 11-point scale before and at the end of the work. Heart rate variability (HRV) variables were calculated from the ECG recordings, and a reduction in the high-frequency component of HRV and an increase in the low- to high-frequency ratio were observed in the stress situation compared to the control session. No changes were seen in the low-frequency component of HRV. The stressors induced an increase in blood pressure compared to baseline that persisted, and for the diastolic pressure it even increased in the subsequent control session. No differences were observed for subjective experience of stress with the exception of a time trend in the exhaustion scale, i.e. a progression in reported exhaustion with time. The results-and the dissociation between HRV and blood pressure variables-indicate that HRV is a more sensitive and selective measure of mental stress. It could be speculated that heart rate-derived variables reflect a central pathway in cardiovascular control mechanisms ("central command"), while the blood pressure response is more influenced by local conditions in the working muscles that partly mask the effect of changes in mental workloads. In the rest period after each work session, HRV and blood pressure variables were partly normalized as expected. However, an 8-min period of rest was insufficient to restore blood pressure to resting values.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 906 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 <1%
Germany 6 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 874 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 207 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 167 18%
Student > Bachelor 136 15%
Researcher 89 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 5%
Other 97 11%
Unknown 167 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 169 19%
Psychology 162 18%
Computer Science 81 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 72 8%
Sports and Recreations 41 5%
Other 177 20%
Unknown 204 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,389,064
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#787
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,505
of 62,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.