↓ Skip to main content

De novo SMARCA2 variants clustered outside the helicase domain cause a new recognizable syndrome with intellectual disability and blepharophimosis distinct from Nicolaides–Baraitser syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
De novo SMARCA2 variants clustered outside the helicase domain cause a new recognizable syndrome with intellectual disability and blepharophimosis distinct from Nicolaides–Baraitser syndrome
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, July 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41436-020-0898-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerarda Cappuccio, Camille Sayou, Pauline Le Tanno, Emilie Tisserant, Ange-Line Bruel, Sara El Kennani, Joaquim Sá, Karen J. Low, Cristina Dias, Markéta Havlovicová, Miroslava Hančárová, Evan E. Eichler, Françoise Devillard, Sébastien Moutton, Julien Van-Gils, Christèle Dubourg, Sylvie Odent, Bénédicte Gerard, Amélie Piton, Toshiyuki Yamamoto, Nobuhiko Okamoto, Helen Firth, Kay Metcalfe, Anna Moh, Kimberly A. Chapman, Erfan Aref-Eshghi, Jennifer Kerkhof, Annalaura Torella, Vincenzo Nigro, Laurence Perrin, Juliette Piard, Gwenaël Le Guyader, Thibaud Jouan, Christel Thauvin-Robinet, Yannis Duffourd, Jaya K. George-Abraham, Catherine A. Buchanan, Denise Williams, Usha Kini, Kate Wilson, Sérgio B. Sousa, Raoul C. M. Hennekam, Bekim Sadikovic, Julien Thevenon, Jérôme Govin, Antonio Vitobello, Nicola Brunetti-Pierri

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 12%
Other 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 17 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Psychology 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 18 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,217,132
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#1,602
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,045
of 428,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#55
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.