↓ Skip to main content

The utility of bispectral index monitoring for sedated patients treated with low-dose remifentanil

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
The utility of bispectral index monitoring for sedated patients treated with low-dose remifentanil
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10877-012-9379-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takao Kato, Toshiya Koitabashi, Takashi Ouchi, Ryohei Serita

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of low-dose remifentanil on the monitoring quality of the Bispectral index for mechanically ventilated patients. Twelve patients who underwent elective surgery and required mechanical ventilation post-operatively were enrolled in this study with written informed consent. Eligible patients were divided into two groups. Patients in the remifentanil group received low-dose remifentanil (0.05-0.125 μg/kg/min) and propofol (1-3 mg/kg/h). Patients in the control group received propofol (1-3 mg/kg/h). Levels of sedation were evaluated by both the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) and BIS monitor (A2000-XP, version 4.0, Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, USA). Monitoring quality was assessed by a correlation between RASS and BIS values. These values were assessed by single regression analysis and a P value of <0.05 was considered significant. There was a significant correlation between RASS and BIS values (P = 3 × 10(-12), R (2) = 0.67) in the remifentanil group, but not in the control group (P = 0.50, R (2) = 0.057). The administration of low-dose remifentanil makes BIS a more precise tool for sedated patients under mechanical ventilation in the ICU.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 25%
Other 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 8 25%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%