| Title |
Laparoscopic Microwave Liver Ablation and Portal Vein Ligation: An Alternative Approach to the Conventional ALPPS Procedure in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-016-5297-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ugo Boggi, Niccolò Napoli, Emanuele F. Kauffmann, Giuseppe Lo Presti, Andrea Moglia |
| Abstract |
Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a new procedure aimed at promoting the overgrowth of small future liver remnants (FLR). The role of ALPPS in hilar cholangiocarcinoma (h-CCA) is currently considered marginal because liver split in the presence of bile duct obstruction increases postoperative morbidity and mortality (Schadde et al. in Ann Surg 260:829-836,2014; Nadalin et al. in Z Gastroenterol 52:35-42,2014). Virtual liver split (Gall et al. in Ann Surg 261:e45-e46,2015) could improve the outcome of ALPPS in h-CCA. A 64-year-old woman with a type IIIA h-CCA without evidence of vascular involvement had a small FLR (FLR/body weight: 0.47 cm(3)/kg). After bilateral percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD) and bilirubin normalization, the patient was planned for laparoscopic step 1 ALPPS using microwave ablation (MWA). Because of possible challenge in hilar dissection in this tumor type, robotic assistance was preferred to conventional laparoscopy for step 1. The patient recovered promptly from step 1, with a 68 % increase in the volume of FLR by postoperative day (POD) 10 (FLR/body weight of 0.79 cm(3)/kg). On POD 15, the patient underwent open right hepatectomy with en bloc resection of the caudate lobe, bile duct bifurcation, and extrahepatic biliary duct (T2N1M0R0). Estimated blood loss was negligible during step 1 and 150 mL during step 2. The patient recovered well. Chemotherapy was started 6 weeks after ALPPS stage 2, and was well tolerated and full course. Twenty months after resection the patient is alive, well, and disease-free. Laparoscopic ALPPS (Machado et al. in Ann Surg 256:e13,2012) and MWA on the intended split line (Gringeri and Boetto in Ann Surg 261:e42-e43,2015) have been recently described. The combination of these techniques with PBD allowed successful ALPPS in a patient with h-CCA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 75% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,332,117
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,511
of 6,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,079
of 340,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#136
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.