↓ Skip to main content

Correction: CD95 maintains stem cell-like and non-classical EMT programs in primary human glioblastoma cells

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Death & Disease, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction: CD95 maintains stem cell-like and non-classical EMT programs in primary human glioblastoma cells
Published in
Cell Death & Disease, July 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41419-020-2698-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moritz Drachsler, Susanne Kleber, Alvaro Mateos, Katrin Volk, Nadine Mohr, Si Chen, Branko Cirovic, Jochen Tüttenberg, Christian Gieffers, Jaromir Sykora, Christian Wirtz, Wolf Mueller, Michael Synowitz, Ana Martin-Villalba

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
#20,631,102
of 23,223,705 outputs
Outputs from Cell Death & Disease
#5,633
of 6,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#342,266
of 399,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Death & Disease
#187
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,223,705 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.