| Title |
Mars Science Laboratory Mission and Science Investigation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Space Science Reviews, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11214-012-9892-2 |
| Authors |
John P. Grotzinger, Joy Crisp, Ashwin R. Vasavada, Robert C. Anderson, Charles J. Baker, Robert Barry, David F. Blake, Pamela Conrad, Kenneth S. Edgett, Bobak Ferdowski, Ralf Gellert, John B. Gilbert, Matt Golombek, Javier Gómez-Elvira, Donald M. Hassler, Louise Jandura, Maxim Litvak, Paul Mahaffy, Justin Maki, Michael Meyer, Michael C. Malin, Igor Mitrofanov, John J. Simmonds, David Vaniman, Richard V. Welch, Roger C. Wiens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 28% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 81% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 420 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 103 | 23% |
| Researcher | 62 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 60 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 53 | 12% |
| Unknown | 91 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 98 | 22% |
| Engineering | 80 | 18% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 60 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Unknown | 107 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,113,459
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#53
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,974
of 179,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.