↓ Skip to main content

Rare disease landscape in Brazil: report of a successful experience in inborn errors of metabolism

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Rare disease landscape in Brazil: report of a successful experience in inborn errors of metabolism
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13023-016-0458-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Giugliani, Filippo P. Vairo, Mariluce Riegel, Carolina F. M. de Souza, Ida V. D. Schwartz, Sérgio D. J. Pena

Abstract

Brazil is a country of continental dimensions, with many social inequalities. The latter are reflected on its health system, which comprises a large public component called SUS, a small paid health insurance component and a third very small private component, in which patients pay personally for medical services. Seventy five percent of the population depends on SUS, which thus far does not provide adequate coverage for genetic medical procedures. In 2014, SUS introduced the "Policy for the Integral Attention to Subjects with Rare Diseases", establishing guidelines for offering diagnosis and treatment. The policy defines the two main axes, genetic and non-genetic rare diseases. In this fashion, public genetic services in SUS will be installed and funded not by themselves, but as part of the more general policy of rare diseases. Unfortunately, up to now this policy is still depending on financial allowances to be effectively launched. In this article, our intention was to describe activities developed in the area of inborn errors of metabolism by a Brazilian reference center. In spite of the lack of support of SUS, thousands of Brazilian families affected by rare genetic metabolic disorders, and many health professionals from all regions of Brazil, already have benefited from the services, training programs and research projects provided by this comprehensive center.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Other 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 39 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 42 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,600,553
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,442
of 3,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,625
of 360,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#27
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.