↓ Skip to main content

Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 1983
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
685 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
599 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk
Published in
Oecologia, February 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf00379695
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. M. Kareiva, N. Shigesada

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 599 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
Canada 8 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
South Africa 4 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
France 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 542 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 155 26%
Researcher 130 22%
Student > Master 88 15%
Student > Bachelor 38 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 30 5%
Other 98 16%
Unknown 60 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 294 49%
Environmental Science 105 18%
Physics and Astronomy 29 5%
Engineering 22 4%
Mathematics 18 3%
Other 53 9%
Unknown 78 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,671,992
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#403
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#675
of 33,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.