| Title |
Patient perceptions of reproductive health counseling at the time of cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of female California cancer survivors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11764-012-0227-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erin Ebbel Niemasik, Joseph Letourneau, Daniel Dohan, Audra Katz, Michelle Melisko, Hope Rugo, Mitchell Rosen |
| Abstract |
We sought to determine what women recall about reproductive health risks (RHR) from cancer therapy at the time of cancer diagnosis in order to identify barriers to reproductive health counseling (RHC) and fertility preservation (FP). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Unknown | 35 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 25% |
| Psychology | 19 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2012.
All research outputs
#13,365,440
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#638
of 959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,255
of 164,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.