↓ Skip to main content

Digital engagement methods for earthquake and fire preparedness: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Digital engagement methods for earthquake and fire preparedness: a review
Published in
Natural Hazards, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2378-x
Authors

Enrica Verrucci, Gabriela Perez-Fuentes, Tiziana Rossetto, Luke Bisby, Muki Haklay, David Rush, Patrick Rickles, Gretchen Fagg, Helene Joffe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 108 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 20%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 7 6%
Lecturer 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 34 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 14%
Computer Science 10 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 7%
Engineering 8 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 39 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,857,658
of 23,383,275 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#342
of 1,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,163
of 340,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,383,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.