↓ Skip to main content

Congenital Hypothyroidism Caused by Excess Prenatal Maternal Iodine Ingestion

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatrics, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
patent
19 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Congenital Hypothyroidism Caused by Excess Prenatal Maternal Iodine Ingestion
Published in
Journal of Pediatrics, July 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.05.057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kara J. Connelly, Bruce A. Boston, Elizabeth N. Pearce, David Sesser, David Snyder, Lewis E. Braverman, Sam Pino, Stephen H. LaFranchi

Abstract

We report the cases of 3 infants with congenital hypothyroidism detected with the use of our newborn screening program, with evidence supporting excess maternal iodine ingestion (12.5 mg/d) as the etiology. Levels of whole blood iodine extracted from their newborn screening specimens were 10 times above mean control levels. Excess iodine ingestion from nutritional supplements is often unrecognized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 114 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 39 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 39 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,702,879
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatrics
#934
of 12,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,115
of 179,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatrics
#10
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.