You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Congenital Hypothyroidism Caused by Excess Prenatal Maternal Iodine Ingestion
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pediatrics, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.05.057 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kara J. Connelly, Bruce A. Boston, Elizabeth N. Pearce, David Sesser, David Snyder, Lewis E. Braverman, Sam Pino, Stephen H. LaFranchi |
Abstract |
We report the cases of 3 infants with congenital hypothyroidism detected with the use of our newborn screening program, with evidence supporting excess maternal iodine ingestion (12.5 mg/d) as the etiology. Levels of whole blood iodine extracted from their newborn screening specimens were 10 times above mean control levels. Excess iodine ingestion from nutritional supplements is often unrecognized. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | 36% |
Argentina | 1 | 9% |
Canada | 1 | 9% |
Grenada | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 114 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 17% |
Unknown | 39 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 39 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,702,879
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatrics
#934
of 12,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,115
of 179,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatrics
#10
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.