↓ Skip to main content

Isolation and characterization of autoantibodies against human cystatin C

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Isolation and characterization of autoantibodies against human cystatin C
Published in
Amino Acids, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00726-016-2271-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martyna Prądzińska, Izabela Behrendt, Marta Spodzieja, Aleksandra S. Kołodziejczyk, Sylwia Rodziewicz-Motowidło, Aneta Szymańska, Susanna L. Lundström, Roman A. Zubarev, Katarzyna Macur, Paulina Czaplewska

Abstract

Hereditary cystatin C amyloid angiopathy (HCCAA) is a severe neurodegenerative disorder related to the point mutation in cystatin C gene resulting in human cystatin C (hCC) L68Q variant. One of the potential immunotherapeutic approaches to HCCAA treatment is based on naturally occurring antibodies against cystatin C. A recent growing interest in autoantibodies, especially in the context of neurodegenerative diseases, emerges from their potential use as valuable diagnostic markers and for controlling protein aggregation. In this work, we present characteristics of natural anti-hCC antibodies isolated from the IgG fraction of human serum by affinity chromatography. The electrophoresis (1-D and 2-D) results demonstrated that the isolated NAbs are a polyclonal mixture, but their electrophoretic properties did not allow to classify the new autoantibodies to any particular type of IgG. The Fc-glycan status of the studied autoantibodies was assessed using mass spectrometry analysis. For the isolated NAbs, the epitopic fragments in hCC sequence were identified by MS-assisted proteolytic excision of the immune complex and compared with the ones predicted theoretically. The knowledge of hCC fragments binding to NAbs and other ligands may contribute to the search for new diagnostic methods for amyloidosis of different types and the search for their treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 27%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 23%
Chemistry 4 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,332,117
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#1,285
of 1,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,079
of 340,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#31
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.