↓ Skip to main content

Joseph Gensoul and the earliest illustrated operations for maxillary sinus carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Joseph Gensoul and the earliest illustrated operations for maxillary sinus carcinoma
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00405-012-2123-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory Tsoucalas, Fotini Gentimi, Antonis A. Kousoulis, Marianna Karamanou, George Androutsos

Abstract

Surgery has evolved along with anatomical illustrations through the ages. Joseph Gensoul (1797-1858), an important figure of the great Lyonnaise medical tradition of the 19th century, was occupied with many different surgical diseases, mostly diseases of the face. Apart from his many contributions stand various techniques on ophthalmological, otorhinolaryngological and oral and maxillofacial surgery. In this context, two rare illustrations depicting an innovative facial surgical operation performed by the great surgeon Joseph Gensoul are thoroughly analyzed. The two illustrations represent the "before" and "after" phases of Gensoul's most eminent operation, most probably practiced for a maxillary sinus carcinoma. This surgical operation is probably the earliest recorded of its kind in the history of surgery, even though the development of maxillary surgery is connected with the practice of Irwin Moure, who also practiced a type of lateral rhinotomy about a century later than Gensoul. Surgical illustrations are closely related to the history of surgery in every corner of the world.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 86%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,110,585
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#298
of 3,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,851
of 164,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#3
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,036 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.