↓ Skip to main content

Advances in Parasitology

Overview of attention for book
Advances in Parasitology
Elsevier Science
Attention for Chapter: The use and implications of ribosomal DNA sequencing for the discrimination of digenean species.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The use and implications of ribosomal DNA sequencing for the discrimination of digenean species.
Book title
Advances in Parasitology
Published in
Advances in Parasitology, October 2005
DOI 10.1016/s0065-308x(05)60002-4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-0-12-031760-8
Authors

Nolan MJ, Cribb TH, Matthew J. Nolan, Thomas H. Cribb

Abstract

In just over a decade, the use of molecular approaches for the recognition of parasites has become commonplace. For trematodes, the internal transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNA (ITS rDNA) has become the default region of choice. Here, we review the findings of 63 studies that report ITS rDNA sequence data for about 155 digenean species from 19 families, and then review the levels of variation that have been reported and how the variation has been interpreted. Overall, complete ITS sequences (or ITS1 or ITS2 regions alone) usually distinguish trematode species clearly, including combinations for which morphology gives ambiguous results. Closely related species may have few base differences and in at least one convincing case the ITS2 sequences of two "good" species are identical. In some cases, the ITS1 region gives greater resolution than the ITS2 because of the presence of variable repeat units that are generally lacking in the ITS2. Intraspecific variation is usually low and frequently apparently absent. Information on geographical variation of digeneans is limited but at least some of the reported variation probably reflects the presence of multiple species. Despite the accepted dogma that concerted evolution makes the individual representative of the entire species, a significant number of studies have reported at least some intraspecific variation. The significance of such variation is difficult to assess a posteriori, but it seems likely that identification and sequencing errors account for some of it and failure to recognise separate species may also be significant. Some reported variation clearly requires further analysis. The use of a "yardstick" to determine when separate species should be recognised is flawed. Instead, we argue that consistent genetic differences that are associated with consistent morphological or biological traits should be considered the marker for separate species. We propose a generalised approach to the use of rDNA to distinguish trematode species.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 88 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 26%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 23 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2012.
All research outputs
#20,163,398
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Parasitology
#288
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,020
of 58,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Parasitology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them