You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Common mistakes in ecological niche models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Geographical Information Science, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/13658816.2020.1798968 |
| Authors |
Neftalí Sillero, A. Márcia Barbosa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 20% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Czechia | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 431 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 431 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 68 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 13% |
| Unknown | 122 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 131 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 89 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 4% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 7% |
| Unknown | 137 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,794,863
of 25,460,285 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Geographical Information Science
#44
of 876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,818
of 428,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Geographical Information Science
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 876 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.