| Title |
Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Aortic Valve Replacement as an Alternative to Surgical Re-Replacement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierre Deharo, Arnaud Bisson, Julien Herbert, Thibaud Lacour, Christophe Saint Etienne, Alizée Porto, Alexis Theron, Frederic Collart, Thierry Bourguignon, Thomas Cuisset, Laurent Fauchier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
| Spain | 5 | 8% |
| Argentina | 3 | 5% |
| Japan | 3 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 66% |
| Scientists | 13 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 36% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2021.
All research outputs
#785,670
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,969
of 16,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,342
of 426,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#64
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.