↓ Skip to main content

Iron toxicity in neurodegeneration

Overview of attention for article published in BioMetals, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Iron toxicity in neurodegeneration
Published in
BioMetals, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10534-012-9523-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco T. Núñez, Pamela Urrutia, Natalia Mena, Pabla Aguirre, Victoria Tapia, Julio Salazar

Abstract

Iron is an essential element for life on earth, participating in a plethora of cellular processes where one-electron transfer reactions are required. Its essentiality, coupled to its scarcity in aqueous oxidative environments, has compelled living organisms to develop mechanisms that ensure an adequate iron supply, at times with disregard to long-term deleterious effects derived from iron accumulation. However, iron is an intrinsic producer of reactive oxygen species, and increased levels of iron promote neurotoxicity because of hydroxyl radical formation, which results in glutathione consumption, protein aggregation, lipid peroxidation and nucleic acid modification. Neurons from brain areas sensitive to degeneration accumulate iron with age and thus are subjected to an ever increasing oxidative stress with the accompanying cellular damage. The ability of these neurons to survive depends on the adaptive mechanisms developed to cope with the increasing oxidative load. Here, we describe the chemical and thermodynamic peculiarities of iron chemistry in living matter, review the components of iron homeostasis in neurons and elaborate on the mechanisms by which iron homeostasis is lost in Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and other diseases in which iron accumulation has been demonstrated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 143 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 23%
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 21%
Neuroscience 22 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 13%
Chemistry 8 5%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2023.
All research outputs
#17,634,595
of 25,846,867 outputs
Outputs from BioMetals
#432
of 710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,419
of 256,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMetals
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,846,867 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.