↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptomic response of Enterococcus faecalis to iron excess

Overview of attention for article published in BioMetals, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Transcriptomic response of Enterococcus faecalis to iron excess
Published in
BioMetals, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10534-012-9539-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guadalupe López, Mauricio Latorre, Angélica Reyes-Jara, Verónica Cambiazo, Mauricio González

Abstract

Iron is an essential nutrient for sustaining bacterial growth; however, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that govern gene expression during the homeostatic response to iron availability. In this study we analyzed the global transcriptional response of Enterococcus faecalis to a non-toxic iron excess in order to identify the set of genes that respond to an increment of intracellular iron. Our results showed an up-regulation of transcriptional regulators of the Fur family (PerR and ZurR), the cation efflux family (CzcD) and ferredoxin, while proton-dependent Mn/Fe (MntH) transporters and the universal stress protein (UspA) were down-regulated. This indicated that E. faecalis was able to activate a transcriptional response while growing in the presence of an excess of non-toxic iron, assuring the maintenance of iron homeostasis. Gene expression analysis of E. faecalis treated with H(2)O(2) indicated that a fraction of the transcriptional changes induced by iron appears to be mediated by oxidative stress. A comparison of our transcriptomic data with a recently reported set of differentially expressed genes in E. faecalis grown in blood, revealed an important fraction of common genes. In particular, genes associated to oxidative stress were up-regulated in both conditions, while genes encoding the iron uptake system (feo and ycl operons) were up-regulated when cells were grown in blood. This suggested that blood cultures mimic an iron deficit, and was corroborated by measuring feo and ycl expression in E. faecalis treated with the iron chelating agent 2,2-dipyridil. In summary, our group identified an adaptive transcriptional mechanism in response to metal ion stress in E. faecalis, providing a foundation for future in-depth functional studies of the iron-activated regulatory network.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Other 12 32%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 14%
Mathematics 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2012.
All research outputs
#18,312,024
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from BioMetals
#450
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,079
of 160,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMetals
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.