You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Predicting Intentions to Engage With Scientific Messages on Twitter: The Roles of Mirth and Need for Humor
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science Communication, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1177/1075547020942512 |
Authors |
Sara K. Yeo, Leona Yi-Fan Su, Michael A. Cacciatore, Meaghan McKasy, Sijia Qian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 3 | 23% |
United States | 2 | 15% |
India | 1 | 8% |
Finland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
Scientists | 5 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 27 | 51% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 11 | 21% |
Psychology | 4 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 27 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,336,198
of 25,487,317 outputs
Outputs from Science Communication
#167
of 577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,391
of 427,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Communication
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,487,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.