↓ Skip to main content

Empowerment scheduling for a field workforce

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Scheduling, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Empowerment scheduling for a field workforce
Published in
Journal of Scheduling, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10951-011-0232-2
Authors

Abdullah Alsheddy, Edward P. K. Tsang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Indonesia 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Malta 1 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 48 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Other 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 17 31%
Computer Science 9 17%
Engineering 3 6%
Mathematics 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2013.
All research outputs
#18,312,024
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Scheduling
#86
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,066
of 108,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Scheduling
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them