| Title |
Provision of services in primary care for type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study with patients, GPs, and nurses in the East of England
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x710945 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hajira Dambha-Miller, Simon J Griffin, Ann Louise Kinmonth, Jenni Burt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 72% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 21 | 31% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 21 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,761,058
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,276
of 4,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,570
of 398,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#34
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.