↓ Skip to main content

The rare and undiagnosed diseases diagnostic service – application of massively parallel sequencing in a state-wide clinical service

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
The rare and undiagnosed diseases diagnostic service – application of massively parallel sequencing in a state-wide clinical service
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13023-016-0462-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gareth Baynam, Nicholas Pachter, Fiona McKenzie, Sharon Townshend, Jennie Slee, Cathy Kiraly-Borri, Anand Vasudevan, Anne Hawkins, Stephanie Broley, Lyn Schofield, Hedwig Verhoef, Caroline E. Walker, Caron Molster, Jenefer M. Blackwell, Sarra Jamieson, Dave Tang, Timo Lassmann, Kym Mina, John Beilby, Mark Davis, Nigel Laing, Lesley Murphy, Tarun Weeramanthri, Hugh Dawkins, Jack Goldblatt

Abstract

The Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases Diagnostic Service (RUDDS) refers to a genomic diagnostic platform operating within the Western Australian Government clinical services delivered through Genetic Services of Western Australia (GSWA). GSWA has provided a state-wide service for clinical genetic care for 28 years and it serves a population of 2.5 million people across a geographical area of 2.5milion Km(2). Within this context, GSWA has established a clinically integrated genomic diagnostic platform in partnership with other public health system managers and service providers, including but not limited to the Office of Population Health Genomics, Diagnostic Genomics (PathWest Laboratories) and with executive level support from the Department of Health. Herein we describe report presents the components of this service that are most relevant to the heterogeneity of paediatric clinical genetic care. Briefly the platform : i) offers multiple options including non-genetic testing; monogenic and genomic (targeted in silico filtered and whole exome) analysis; and matchmaking; ii) is delivered in a patient-centric manner that is resonant with the patient journey, it has multiple points for entry, exit and re-entry to allow people access to information they can use, when they want to receive it; iii) is synchronous with precision phenotyping methods; iv) captures new knowledge, including multiple expert review; v) is integrated with current translational genomic research activities and best practice; and vi) is designed for flexibility for interactive generation of, and integration with, clinical research for diagnostics, community engagement, policy and models of care. The RUDDS has been established as part of routine clinical genetic services and is thus sustainable, equitably managed and seeks to translate new knowledge into efficient diagnostics and improved health for the whole community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 92 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 13%
Engineering 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,892,570
of 23,905,714 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#676
of 2,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,428
of 353,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,905,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.