↓ Skip to main content

Practical Methods for Imputing Follower Count Dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Sociological Methods & Research, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Practical Methods for Imputing Follower Count Dynamics
Published in
Sociological Methods & Research, July 2020
DOI 10.1177/0049124120926210
Authors

C. Ben Gibson, Jeannette Sutton, Sarah K. Vos, Carter T. Butts

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 38%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,072,872
of 23,599,923 outputs
Outputs from Sociological Methods & Research
#175
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,075
of 400,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociological Methods & Research
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,599,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.