You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
6&6: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Art–Science Collaboration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biaa076 |
| Authors |
Sarah E Clark, Eric Magrane, Thomas Baumgartner, Scott E K Bennett, Michael Bogan, Taylor Edwards, Mark A Dimmitt, Heather Green, Charles Hedgcock, Benjamin M Johnson, Maria R Johnson, Kathleen Velo, Benjamin T Wilder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 30% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
| Scientists | 9 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,269,221
of 25,347,437 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#839
of 3,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,059
of 406,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#17
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,347,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.