↓ Skip to main content

Interdiction in practice—Hardware Trojan against a high-security USB flash drive

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cryptographic Engineering, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Interdiction in practice—Hardware Trojan against a high-security USB flash drive
Published in
Journal of Cryptographic Engineering, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13389-016-0132-7
Authors

Pawel Swierczynski, Marc Fyrbiak, Philipp Koppe, Amir Moradi, Christof Paar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 29%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 25 60%
Engineering 9 21%
Linguistics 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,377,977
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cryptographic Engineering
#46
of 62 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,147
of 341,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cryptographic Engineering
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.