| Title |
Corporate Philanthropy, Reputation Risk Management and Shareholder Value: A Study of Australian Corporate giving
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-016-3205-8 |
| Authors |
Kate Hogarth, Marion Hutchinson, Wendy Scaife |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 72 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 77 | 38% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 19 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | <1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 82 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,103,598
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#174
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,067
of 334,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.