↓ Skip to main content

Effect of 830 nm low-level laser therapy applied before high-intensity exercises on skeletal muscle recovery in athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Lasers in Medical Science, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 1,303)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
Title
Effect of 830 nm low-level laser therapy applied before high-intensity exercises on skeletal muscle recovery in athletes
Published in
Lasers in Medical Science, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10103-008-0633-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ernesto Cesar Pinto Leal Junior, Rodrigo Álvaro Brandão Lopes-Martins, Bruno Manfredini Baroni, Thiago De Marchi, Daiana Taufer, Débora Sgandella Manfro, Morgana Rech, Vanessa Danna, Douglas Grosselli, Rafael Abeche Generosi, Rodrigo Labat Marcos, Luciano Ramos, Jan Magnus Bjordal

Abstract

Our aim was to investigate the immediate effects of bilateral, 830 nm, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on high-intensity exercise and biochemical markers of skeletal muscle recovery, in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial set in a sports physiotherapy clinic. Twenty male athletes (nine professional volleyball players and eleven adolescent soccer players) participated. Active LLLT (830 nm wavelength, 100 mW, spot size 0.0028 cm(2), 3-4 J per point) or an identical placebo LLLT was delivered to five points in the rectus femoris muscle (bilaterally). The main outcome measures were the work performed in the Wingate test: 30 s of maximum cycling with a load of 7.5% of body weight, and the measurement of blood lactate (BL) and creatine kinase (CK) levels before and after exercise. There was no significant difference in the work performed during the Wingate test (P > 0.05) between subjects given active LLLT and those given placebo LLLT. For volleyball athletes, the change in CK levels from before to after the exercise test was significantly lower (P = 0.0133) for those given active LLLT (2.52 U l(-1) +/- 7.04 U l(-1)) than for those given placebo LLLT (28.49 U l(-1) +/- 22.62 U l(-1)). For the soccer athletes, the change in blood lactate levels from before exercise to 15 min after exercise was significantly lower (P < 0.01) in the group subjected to active LLLT (8.55 mmol l(-1) +/- 2.14 mmol l(-1)) than in the group subjected to placebo LLLT (10.52 mmol l(-1) +/- 1.82 mmol l(-1)). LLLT irradiation before the Wingate test seemed to inhibit an expected post-exercise increase in CK level and to accelerate post-exercise lactate removal without affecting test performance. These findings suggest that LLLT may be of benefit in accelerating post-exercise recovery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 2%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 241 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 18%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Researcher 15 6%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 77 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 19%
Sports and Recreations 46 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 90 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,547,441
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#44
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,404
of 164,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them