↓ Skip to main content

Breast Cancer Screening Among Women with Medicaid, 2006–2008: a Multilevel Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Breast Cancer Screening Among Women with Medicaid, 2006–2008: a Multilevel Analysis
Published in
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40615-016-0245-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lee Rivers Mobley, Sujha Subramanian, Florence K. Tangka, Sonja Hoover, Jiantong Wang, Ingrid J. Hall, Simple D. Singh

Abstract

Nationally, about one third of women with breast cancer (BC) are diagnosed at late stage, which might be reduced with greater utilization of BC screening. The purpose of this paper is to examine the predictors of BC mammography use among women with Medicaid, and differences among Medicaid beneficiaries in their propensity to use mammography. The sample included 2,450,527 women drawn from both fee-for-service and managed care Medicaid claims from 25 states, during 2006-2008. The authors used multilevel modeling of predictors at person, county, and state levels of influence and examined traditional factors affecting access and the expanded scope of practice allowed for the nurse practitioner (NP) in some states to provide primary care independent of physician oversight. Black [OR = 0.87; 95 % CI (0.87-0.88)] and American Indian women [OR = 0.74; 95 % CI (0.71-0.76)] had lower odds ratio of mammography use than white women, while Hispanic [OR = 1.06; 95 % CI (1.05-1.07)] had higher odds ratio of mammography use than white women. Living in counties with higher Hispanic residential segregation [OR = 1.16; 95 % CI (1.10-1.23)] was associated with a higher odds ratio of mammography use compared to areas with low Hispanic residential segregation, whereas living among more segregated black [OR = 0.78; 95 % CI (0.75-0.81)] or Asian [OR = 0.19; 95 % CI (0.17-0.21)] communities had lower odds ratio compared to areas with low segregation. Holding constant statistically the perceived shortage of MDs, which was associated with significantly lower mammography use, the NP regulatory variable [OR = 1.03; 95 % CI (1.01-1.07)] enhanced the odds ratio of mammography use among women in the six states with expanded scope of practice, compared with women residing in 19 more restrictive states. Racial and ethnic disparities exist in the use of mammography among Medicaid-insured women. More expansive NP practice privileges in states are associated with higher utilization, and may help reduce rural disparities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 5 8%
Librarian 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 18 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Social Sciences 9 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Unspecified 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 26 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2016.
All research outputs
#4,702,080
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#449
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,686
of 345,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.