| Title |
Effects of cadmium hyperaccumulation on the concentrations of four trace elements in Lonicera japonica Thunb.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecotoxicology, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10646-011-0609-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhouli Liu, Xingyuan He, Wei Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,190,980
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#131
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,234
of 185,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.